Skip to main content

The Concept of Principles of Natural Justice

Principles of Natural Justice refer to fundamental legal principles that ensure fairness in legal proceedings and decision-making processes. These principles are rooted in ensuring that decisions are made in a just and unbiased manner.

Following are the Key Principals :

1. Audi Alteram Partem (Right to Be Heard) Explanation: This principle ensures that both parties involved in a case have the opportunity to present their side before any decision is made. Affected persons must be informed of the allegations against them and given a chance to defend themselves.

2. Nemo Judex in Causa Sua (Rule Against Bias) Explanation: This principle requires the decision- maker to be impartial and free from any personal interest in the outcome of the case.

3. Notice Explanation: Adequate notice of the charges, hearing dates, and the consequences must be given to the person concerned. It allows them to prepare for the hearing.

4. Reasoned Decision Explanation: The authority must provide a clear, reasoned decision. A mere pronouncement without explaining the rationale is insufficient. The decision must mention the key issues, findings, and reasoning.

5. Right to Present Evidence Explanation: The person affected should be allowed to present evidence in their defense. This includes both documentary and oral evidence.

6. Cross-Examination Explanation: The affected party must have the opportunity to cross-examine witnesses or challenge the evidence presented against them.

7. Decision Based on Evidence Explanation: Decisions must be based on relevant evidence presented during the hearing. Authorities cannot rely on assumptions, extraneous materials, or personal knowledge to make their decision.

8. Rule of Fairness Explanation: Fairness is the overarching principle governing natural justice. Even if all procedural aspects are followed, if the overall process is not fair, the decision can be challenged.

9. Right to Appeal Explanation: A person affected by a decision should have the right to challenge it before a higher or appellate authority. This right ensures that any errors or biases in the initial decision can be rectified.

10. Institutional Bias Explanation: The decision-making body must not have any institutional interest in the outcome of the proceedings. If the institution itself stands to gain from the outcome, it cannot be an impartial decision-maker.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Posh in Higher Education Institutions in India

On July 25, 2022, an Odisha college student accused the school's physics instructor of rape and sexual harassment. The accused lecturer, who was the institution's reader, had also held the role of NCC officer in the Naval wing. Despite the female student coming to the institute with a formal complaint, the school's internal committee did not discover any proof of the claims she claimed. The probe didn't start until the Higher Education Department became aware of the situation. A Presidency University student from Kolkata filed a formal complaint with the internal committee of the university accusing Mahitosh Mandal, the former head of the department, of sexual harassment on July 17, 2022. It is believed that the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013, is essential for protecting female employees from sexual harassment at the workplace. It is significant to highlight that educational institutions play a significant role...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking the Chains: Unraveling Cultural Norms and Attitudes Contributing to Sexual Harassment in India.

Sexual harassment is deeply intertwined with cultural norms and attitudes that permeate societies, shaping perceptions and behaviors. This article delves into the examination of cultural norms, attitudes, and stereotypes in India that contribute to sexual harassment. It also explores strategies aimed at challenging and changing these harmful beliefs, fostering a cultural shift towards respect, equality, and a safer society. Cultural Norms and Attitudes: In India, cultural norms and attitudes often play a significant role in perpetuating sexual harassment. Traditional gender roles, patriarchal structures, and deeply ingrained stereotypes contribute to power imbalances and create an environment where harassment can thrive. The stigma surrounding discussions of sexuality and the perpetuation of harmful norms further impede progress toward a more equitable society. Stereotypes Perpetuating Harassment: Stereotypes surrounding masculinity, femininity, and societal expectations exacerbate th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Expanding POSH: The Push to Protect India's Informal Workforce.

The Prevention of Sexual Harassment ( POSH ) Act of 2013 marked a significant milestone in India's journey towards safer workplaces. However, a glaring gap remains in its coverage: the informal sector. With an estimated 90% of India's workforce employed in informal settings, the need to extend POSH protections to this vast and vulnerable population has become a pressing concern. The Current Landscape The Informal Sector in India India's informal sector encompasses a wide range of occupations, including: • Domestic workers • Street vendors • Agricultural laborers • Construction workers • Home-based workers These workers often lack formal contracts, social security benefits, and legal protections, making them particularly vulnerable to exploitation and harassment. Limitations of the Current POSH Act The POSH Act, in its current form, is primarily designed for formal workplaces. It mandates the formation of Internal Complaints Committees (ICCs) in organizations with ...
Post a Comment
Read more