Skip to main content

The Concept of Principles of Natural Justice

Principles of Natural Justice refer to fundamental legal principles that ensure fairness in legal proceedings and decision-making processes. These principles are rooted in ensuring that decisions are made in a just and unbiased manner.

Following are the Key Principals :

1. Audi Alteram Partem (Right to Be Heard) Explanation: This principle ensures that both parties involved in a case have the opportunity to present their side before any decision is made. Affected persons must be informed of the allegations against them and given a chance to defend themselves.

2. Nemo Judex in Causa Sua (Rule Against Bias) Explanation: This principle requires the decision- maker to be impartial and free from any personal interest in the outcome of the case.

3. Notice Explanation: Adequate notice of the charges, hearing dates, and the consequences must be given to the person concerned. It allows them to prepare for the hearing.

4. Reasoned Decision Explanation: The authority must provide a clear, reasoned decision. A mere pronouncement without explaining the rationale is insufficient. The decision must mention the key issues, findings, and reasoning.

5. Right to Present Evidence Explanation: The person affected should be allowed to present evidence in their defense. This includes both documentary and oral evidence.

6. Cross-Examination Explanation: The affected party must have the opportunity to cross-examine witnesses or challenge the evidence presented against them.

7. Decision Based on Evidence Explanation: Decisions must be based on relevant evidence presented during the hearing. Authorities cannot rely on assumptions, extraneous materials, or personal knowledge to make their decision.

8. Rule of Fairness Explanation: Fairness is the overarching principle governing natural justice. Even if all procedural aspects are followed, if the overall process is not fair, the decision can be challenged.

9. Right to Appeal Explanation: A person affected by a decision should have the right to challenge it before a higher or appellate authority. This right ensures that any errors or biases in the initial decision can be rectified.

10. Institutional Bias Explanation: The decision-making body must not have any institutional interest in the outcome of the proceedings. If the institution itself stands to gain from the outcome, it cannot be an impartial decision-maker.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Expanding POSH: The Push to Protect India's Informal Workforce.

The Prevention of Sexual Harassment ( POSH ) Act of 2013 marked a significant milestone in India's journey towards safer workplaces. However, a glaring gap remains in its coverage: the informal sector. With an estimated 90% of India's workforce employed in informal settings, the need to extend POSH protections to this vast and vulnerable population has become a pressing concern. The Current Landscape The Informal Sector in India India's informal sector encompasses a wide range of occupations, including: • Domestic workers • Street vendors • Agricultural laborers • Construction workers • Home-based workers These workers often lack formal contracts, social security benefits, and legal protections, making them particularly vulnerable to exploitation and harassment. Limitations of the Current POSH Act The POSH Act, in its current form, is primarily designed for formal workplaces. It mandates the formation of Internal Complaints Committees (ICCs) in organizations with ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Redefining Boundaries: The Impact of Remote Work on POSH Implementation.

The global shift towards remote and hybrid work models, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, has fundamentally altered the landscape of workplace interactions. This transformation has inevitably affected the implementation of the Prevention of Sexual Harassment ( POSH ) Act in India. As the lines between professional and personal spaces blur in virtual environments, organizations face new challenges in ensuring compliance with POSH guidelines and maintaining safe, respectful work cultures. The Changing Nature of Workplace Harassment in Remote Settings New Forms of Harassment The virtual workplace has given rise to novel forms of harassment: 1. Cyber Sexual Harassment: Inappropriate messages, images, or videos shared through digital platforms. 2. Virtual Stalking: Excessive monitoring or unwanted attention through online channels. 3. Zoom-bombing: Intrusion into video calls with offensive content or behavior. 4. Inappropriate Virtual Backgrounds: Use of suggestive or offensive ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Navigating POSH Implementation: Challenges for Small and Medium Enterprises in India.

In the decade since the implementation of the Prevention of Sexual Harassment ( POSH ) Act of 2013, India has made significant strides in addressing workplace harassment. However, while large corporations have largely adapted to the new regulatory environment, Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) continue to grapple with the complexities of implementing POSH guidelines effectively. The POSH Predicament for SMEs SMEs, which form the backbone of India's economy, often find themselves in a precarious position when it comes to POSH compliance. The challenges they face are multifaceted: 1. Limited Resources: Unlike their larger counterparts, SMEs often operate on tight budgets, making it difficult to allocate funds for POSH-related initiatives. 2. Lack of Awareness: Many SME owners and employees are not fully aware of the POSH Act's requirements and their rights and responsibilities under it. 3. Informal Work Culture: The often close-knit, informal nature of SMEs can make it...
Post a Comment
Read more